Sell Recommmendations & Realized Gains

The following are the percentage returns and the time held for each stock that received a Research recommendation followed by a Sell recommendation in the given year:

2009 Sell Recommendations


2008 Sell Recommendations
    What is important about these performance numbers is that the Research recommendation, which precedes the sell recommendation, isn't necessarily a buy signal. Instead, the Research recommendation requires doing your homework and then putting these stocks on a watch list. Once an opportune time has arrived then a purchase can be made. Most, but not all, Research recommendations will contain an "ideal" price to buy a stock which is usually lower than the price posted on the blog. Touc .

    Something to ponder...


    The chart above depicts the wholesale inflation rate from 1749-1980. The wonderful chart comes from The Wall Street Waltz by Kenneth L. Fisher manager of Fisher Investment and columnist at Forbes. What I would like to point out is that during this war we have experienced relatively little inflation. In fact, no other congressionally approved war except for Gulf War I did we not have to feel the consequences in the way of significantly higher prices at the pump and other basic necessities.

    Please take a look at the rate of inflation before and after each warring period in U.S. history. During the period of the American Revolution inflation jumped 300%. During the War of 1812, inflation increased approximately 70%. The Civil War experienced inflation spike of 80%. World War I saw a surge of inflation by 115%. World War II had an increase of inflation of 100%. A small increase in inflation occured during the Korean War tallying a 12% jump which was a continuation of the WWII inflation. Finally, the Viet Nam War resulted in an inflationary spike of 290%.
    What are the causes of these large spikes in inflation? The huge amount of government spending to finance each of these wars. The current war is no exception. Why didn't we get hit with high inflation during or after that last Gulf War? Government spending was put in check by a relatively quick end to the war. Also, the U.S. economy was in the middle of it's 18 year boom. While the booming economy wasn't a guarantee, in retrospect we could easily give an explantion as to the factors contributing to it.

    Since we're not feeling the inflationary heat right now we can only expect that, at some point soon, we will experience inflation on the level of what happened during and after the Viet Nam War. If, for some reason, we're able to stave off inflation somehow I expect that we'll see the impact somewhere else in the world. Matters of inflation do not exist in a vacuum. Keep in mind that on every equation both sides need to be equal. The only difference in the world of economics is that it takes time for the equation to be reconciled.





  • Email our team
  • More news on AFLAC...

    This post contains updated information regarding my research recommendation of Aflac (AFL) on March 9, 2007.

    In the April 9, 2007 edition of Forbes magazine, John Rogers advises the purchase of AFL. I promise I didn't get an advanced copy of the magazine. Rogers makes two very interesting points about AFL. Point number one, AFL "has payroll deduction arrangements with employees at 91% of the companies traded on the Tokyo Stock Exchange." As Rogers points out, this is a monopoly if there ever was one. Point two, AFL shares "trade at a 21% discount."

    John Rogers' opinion carries a lot of weight in my book. I suspect that AFL might be able to fall another 5%-10%. Despite my downside projections the upside reward far exceeds the potential risks.


  • Email our team
  • Near the Bottom...

    Today's post will provide us with the Dividend Achievers that are within 5% of their 1 year low. You'll notice that there are a lot of stocks which are in the banking sector. It is very important that you take care before buying the banking stocks. This sector is most vunerable to a decline if the mortgage industry continues to decline. This does not mean avoid banks, rather, consider carefully those that you choose to include in your portfolio.
    • Brown and Brown (BRO)
    • Brady Corp (BRC)
    • Cincinnati Financial (CINF)
    • Citizens Banking (CRBC)
    • Cullen Frost Bankers (CFR)
    • First Charter (FCTR)
    • FirstMerit Corp (FMER)
    • Fulton Financial (FULT)
    • Progressive (PGR)
    • Protective Life (PL)
    • Sallie Mae (SLM)
    Personally, my favorite sector to invest in is the insurance industry. I highly recommend considering Progressive Insurance (PGR) and Protective Life (PL). Consider that insurance, by law, is required in all 50 states and you've got the formula for a winning product. Insurance companies also have the distinction of being able to calculate the odds of an accident occurring (threat of paying a claim.) This accurately assess the costs associated with a particular claim. Furthermore, when a claim is actually filed, insurance companies typically don't pay out the full amount of the money requested. Enjoy.
    Please read my previous article of Protective Life in my post dated Feb. 8th 2006.


  • Email our team
  • Performance Update of Select Dividend Achievers

    The following is the performance of Divivdend Achievers within the last year from March 21, 2006 until March 21, 2007. Keep in mind that the percentage change of these stocks does not include the annual dividend that would have been received over the same period of time.

    • ABM Industries (ABM) 62%
    • Applebee’s (APPB) 45%
    • Aptar Group (ATR) 45%
    • AT&T (T) 57%
    • Avon (AVP) 45%
    • Bandag (BDG) 55%
    • Eaton Vance (EV) 49%
    • Energen (EGN) 54%
    • EnergySouth (ENSI) 41%
    • Family Dollar Stores (FDO) 36%
    • Frischs Restaurants (FRS) 68%
    • Fuller H B (FUL) 46%
    • General Growth Properties (GGP) 58%
    • Gorman Rupp (GRC) 64%
    • Healthcare Properties (HCP) 46%
    • Helmerich and Payne (HP) 41%
    • Holly Corp (HOC) 80%
    • Johnson Controls (JCI) 43%
    • Kimco Realty (KIM) 47%
    • McDonald’s (MCD) 40%
    • McGrath Rents (MGRC) 45%
    • Meridian Bioscience (VIVO) 50%
    • Nucor (NUE) 46%
    • SEI Investments (SEIC) 51%
    • Service Master (SVM) 58%
    • Sherman Williams (SHW) 54%
    • San Jose Water (SJW) 82%
    • Stryker (SYK) 67%
    • Supervalu (SVU) 49%
    • Telephone Data (TDS) 56%
    • VF Corp (VFC) 48%
    • Vulcan Materials (VMC) 81%
    • West Pharma Svc (WST) 44%
    • Wolverine Worldwide (WWW) 44%

    As you’ll notice, companies with 10 to 35% returns were not included. However, if they were included during this time frame I would have had to add many more companies to the list. If anyone were to complain about receiving only 30% percent in one year with significantly reduced risk then investing in stocks isn't their cup of tea.

    Despite the performance of these stocks I would not buy any of them since they are at or near their 1 year high. I currently hold a large position in Helmerich & Payne which I bought near the 1 year low. I always focus on those stocks that are within 5% of their 1 year low. At that time I determine if the stock is actually worth buying. Once I find another stock that is worth buying I will then jump ship.

    Investment Tip: The larger your stake in a particular investment the better. While diversification is the general rule it is only sufficient when you don't understand the risks associated.



  • Email our team
  • Stocks to Consider...

    The following are what I consider to be the most compelling Dividend Achievers to research and possibly buy at this time. All of these stocks share similar characteristics. First, all of these stocks are trading in a range or near a new low. Any stock that has been able to return to the investor income (and earnings) while the price has remained essentially the same over an extended period of time translates into an underappreciated asset. Also, according to Geraldine Weiss' IQTrends (www.iqtrends.com) model some of these stocks are near their respective buying levels based on her dividend yield model. These stocks have also increased their dividend every year for at least 10 consecutive years in a row. The dividend for these stocks do not exceed company earnings.

    • AFLAC (AFL): This company is among the leading insurance companies in the U.S. and Japan. This company has traded in the $45 - $50 range since 2005 while the dividend has increased over 17% annually over the same period. According to IQTrends (www.iqtrends.com) written by Geraldine Weiss, AFL is undervalued when the dividend reaches 2%. The current dividend yield is at 1.60%. AFL has increased it's dividend for 22 years in a row.

    • Bank of Hawaii (BOH): BOH is the largest bank in the state of Hawaii. BOH has increased it's dividend for 27 consecutive years in a row. This stock has traded in a range for the last 3 years. According to IQTrends BOH is undervalued with a dividend yield of 4%. BOH is yielding around 3.20%. While I am hesitant to dive into banking stocks, especially after the rash of mortgage loan delinquencies, I believe that BOH will prove profitable since it finances some of the most valuable real estate in the world. BOH has traded in $50 range since 2004.

    • Lancaster Colony (LANC): This company is a diversified consumer product company that produces packaged foods to automotive parts. LANC has increased it's dividend for 35 years straight. This stock has traded in a range since 2002.

    • Leggett and Platt (LEG): LEG has traded in the $20 -$30 since 1998. This translates into an incredible amount of untapped value. LEG has increased it's dividend for 33 years.

    Good luck with your research. Please note that this list is expected to change.


  • Email our team
  • Famous Last Words...

    New Century Financial (NEW) is one of the latest real estate investment trusts that is on the brink of all out collapse. It is worth reviewing what management of NEW said during an earnings conference call back in November 2, 2006. Analyst Miguel Fidalgo of Noonday Asset Management asked if, in light of competitors revising their loan losses higher, NEW felt any need to revise their loan loss provisions for the upcoming quarter. Patti Dodge of NEW replied:

    "...we have several years worth of losses built up in the current allowance for loan losses."

    At the time, NEW had a closing price of $35.90. Today, NEW trades at $3.87. With such a brazen and flippant response, one has to wonder if the management team at NEW was thinking clearly at the time.

    Source Citation: "Q3 2006 New Century Financial Corporation Earnings Conference Call - Part 2." The America's Intelligence Wire (Nov 2, 2006): NA. InfoTrac OneFile. Thomson Gale. San Francisco Public Library. 9 Mar. 2007


  • Email our team
  • Gaming the Pre/After Hour Markets

    The following are transactions that took place before and after the regular hours of trading which canceled out gains or losses of the regular hours of trading from the same day. The purpose of tracking this activity is to see if the trends or patterns can be established in the behavior of the related stocks or the general market. One conclusion that I've come to so far can be found in the following related articles:

    Articles

    Pre-Market Data
    The following information demonstrates that low volume pre-market trading determines the closing price of high volume regular hour trading. In most instances, you can find traders are able to buy or sell large allotments of stock without affecting the pre-market price while small allotments can be seen to crush or inflate the price. This defies the basic economic principle of supply and demand affecting price.
    After Hour Market Data
    The following information demonstrates that low volume, after hour trading can undo or off-set all of the previous high volume regular hour trading. As mentioned before, you can find traders are able to buy or sell large allotments of stock without affecting the after hour price while small alloments can be seen to crush or inflate the price.

    Entropy notes

    Source:
    Gold-Eagle
    http://www.gold-eagle.com/editorials_98/marantette121698.html

    The Entropy Danger

    We continue to review Entropy Tops and Bottoms in our newsletters. Over the past 27 years, we have found the analysis of Entropy Tops and Bottoms a terrific addition to the buy and sell points of cyclic analysis. No more valuable or accurate technical analysis tool exists.

    Our Entropy work comes from a tangential application of The Second Law of Thermodynamics. This law basically says that, in the end, all things come to rest. When applied to humans, Entropy equals death.

    When applied to the stock or commodities markets, it means the end of one move and the reversal to the other direction. If the current direction is up, it shows the end of the upmove and the reversal to the downside. If the current move is down, it shows the end of the downmove and the reversal to the upside.

    As we read our charts and discover Entropy Tops and Bottoms, we find the rules apply equally to charts of stocks or commodities. The rules apply equally to charts of any time period — daily, weekly or monthly. The rules apply equally to Dow Jones Industrial stocks and gold mining company stocks. The rules apply equally to Standard & Poor Futures and to Gold or Silver Futures.

    Entropy rules as we now apply them are correct over 90% of the time. No other Technical Analysis tool comes close.

    This week we are fortunate to have a weekly chart that exemplifies the basic rules and also shows a couple of the finer Entropy points as well. Over the years our work has shown us two basic time elements. They are: 1.) Moves up or down at the rate of 80 to 85 degrees, normally last 6 to 9 units of time. 2.) Moves up or down at the rate of 85 to 90 degrees, normally last 3 to 6 time units.

    On a daily chart, time units are calendar days, not trading days. Entropy moves are a minimum of three days. The first unit of any Entropy move counts as day one.

    Entropy moves are basically moves up or down at a rate of change of 80 plus degrees. Entropy moves are exhaustion moves and signal the end of the effort required to make the move to begin with.

    Entropy moves end when the price move of a certain day goes above or below the extreme of the prior day. If a current move is up, the Entropy Top is in place when price action goes below the low of the prior day. If a current move is down, the Entropy Bottom is in place when price action goes above the high of the prior day.

    The chart we use today to show examples of Entropy is the S&P Futures chart – weekly time period.

    The first Entropy move to the upside begins the week of 6-19. It is a rise of 87 degrees and lasts 5 weeks. It ends the week of 7-24 when price action that week goes below the low of the prior week.

    The week of 7-24 begins an Entropy move to the downside. This move lasts 4 weeks at a rate of decline of 88 degrees. It ends when price action the week of 9-18 goes above the high of the prior week. In this instance the downmove doesn't end, as there is a two week extension. However both the Entropy upmove and Entropy downmove result in profitable trades.

    The next upmove begins the week of 10-09. This rise lasts an abnormal 8 weeks long. This rise is truly stupendous at the rate of 87.39 degrees. Remember this is an index of 500 stocks. Some stocks in the index are rising at even higher rates of climb.

    The Entropy Top is now in place as price action last week went below the low of the prior week.

    BUNGEE JUMPERS — READ ON

    So far we've covered the basic points that we make in our two weekly newsletters. Here are the additional finer points we want to point out now.

    There are times when, especially in rises, we say, "Watch Out – after rises like this, the decline on the other side can be as fast if not faster than the rise that brought us to this Entropy Top."

    Now you look at this S & P Futures chart and your reaction may be, "Marantette – No Way!" Well, stay with us. Look back at the 06-19 rise. It took 5 weeks to go from 1074.67 to 1188.04. It took 4 weeks to fall from 1188.04 to 1054.00.

    5 weeks up +113.37 points
    4 weeks down –134.04 points

    Markets go down faster than they go up.

    Now look at last week's price action on the chart again. Is this market now starting down faster than it went up? Looks like it! Time and time again our Entropy analysis shows that after an Entropy rise, the stock or commodity can decline at a rate faster than the previous rise.

    This is why our long-term stock market investors are now 100% in cash. This is why our DowStock mid-term portfolio is 90% short.

    Other work of ours also shows that over the past 30 years, when the stock market declines, gold stocks decline faster and longer then the general market. In our Goldstock Trading Portfolio, which by the way is +62.48% year to date, we are now 100% in cash.

    Unless you are truly a gunslinger, this is no time to be in the stock market.

    David T. Marantette III
    Goldstock Newsletter
    http://www.goldstock.com

    16 December 1998

    What kind of game is this?

    Today, Standard and Poor upgraded Countrywide Financial (CFC) from Strong sell to Sell. What kind of game are these analysts trying to play with us? Does it make sense that something which is so unattractive be worth deeming it less dead that previously noted.


    This kind of manipulation by analysts raises my suspicions. Are the analysts fearful that, by painting a negative, but accurate picture, it is going to become a self-fulfilling prophsey? Does Standard and Poor have a vested interested in CFC? The justification given by Standard and Poor analyst Stuart Plesser for raising Countrywide from the dead to near dead is that it has been hammered so much that it couldn't possibly go any lower. Come on!!!!

    This leads to unjustified optimism without the necessary proof that things have turned around. We need evidence not an analyst's assurance that it can't possibly get worse. This seems all the more outrages when you consider that some 21 companies in the subprime lending industry have filed bankruptcy at or near a perceived top in the real estate financing market (as opposed to the valuation of real estate itself.)

    Continue to wait for the proof before considering this company as worth investing in. Countrywide is still a STRONG SELL.


    Standard and Poor rating

    Countrywide Financial (CFC)

    Ups from 1 STAR (strong sell) to 2 STARS (sell)

    Analyst: Stuart Plesser

    Countrywide's shares have fallen over 10% year-to-date, in our view leaving only modest downside potential. We are concerned about Countrywide's exposure to the subprime market and the possibility of loans being put back to Countrywide due to higher default rates. We also believe that Countrywide's gain-on-sale margin will fall due to a widening of credit spreads in the securitization market. Finally, we remain cautious about Countrywide's option ARM loans, which comprise over 40% of loans held. We are lowering our target price by $2 to $36, 8.2 times our 2007 EPS estimate of $4.37, a discount to Countrywide's historical average.

    http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/feb2007/pi20070227_897788.htm?campaign_id=yhoo


  • Email our team
  • Overall Market Direction...

    When considering the best stocks to purchase you must also consider the risks to the overall market. What this means is that you need to consider where we are and where we might be going. The ideal reference points to start you analysis from are the previous peaks and troughs in any market you chose to invest in. The farther back you can observe the better.

    I have decided to review the previous market cycle top that occurred from Jan. 1966 and ended around Jan. 1982 to demonstrate the power of the market cycles. The chart below from "The Wall Street Waltz" by Forbes Columnist Kenneth Fisher shows the Dow on an inflation-adjusted basis. This chart shows how, after inflation, the market moved sideways or down from Jan. 1966 to Jan. 1982.

    As any cycle goes there is a point that there is an ultimate high or low. The best we can do as market observers and investors is to guesstimate where the bottom might be. Since the stock market has run on a 16-year cycle for the last 100 years it is safe to say that the stock market will hit it's ultimate bottom between 2008 to 2016.

    This forecast doesn't seem very upbeat, I know. However, it is important to keep in mind that this will help you to choose your investments wisely in the coming years. Companies that have a consistent history of paying dividends are definitely going to make the difference in your investment performance.

    Imagine if you bought stocks at the peak of the market in 1966 or 1972. If you had, the biggest stocks for that time would have broke even on your investment in a short period of time (3 to 5 years.) That is why I recommend that you read the article titled "The Nifty Fifty Revisited" by Jeremy Siegel. Siegel studied the top companies performance assuming that you bought at the market peak. It is no coincident that a majority of the companies studied by Siegel were dividend-paying stocks that can still be found in the current Mergent Dividend Achiever list.

    If you chose to invest in stocks then knowing the market's history should serve you well. For those who bought the largest income paying stocks, from '66 to '72 and held on, they were richly rewarded.



  • Email our team
  • Investment Myth Number 2...

    Myth #2: Because a person is young, they have time on their hands and therefore, can afford to take outsized risks to achieve greater potential returns.

    This thesis is based on the assumption that, if you’re wrong about your investment choices (lose all/majority of invested capital) then you’ll be able to make up money lost at a later time.

    Yes, you’ll definitely have a chance to make up for the loss later on down the road. However, by the time you get to the point of “down the road” you’ll have lost the one thing that you could never get back and that is time.

    During the time that you’ve erroronously invested your funds (you believe otherwise at the time) you’ve lost the opportunity to compound your investment with dividend paying stocks, CDs, bonds, real estate or any other income producing investment. You end up carrying all the risk with little to show in the way of reward as you finally and ultimately give in to the reality of your current investment choices.

  • Email our team
  • Investment Reading List


    • The Nifty Fifty Revisited by Jeremy Siegel
    • Relative Dividend Yield- Anthony Spare
    • Dividend Connection- Geraldine Weiss
    • Single Best Investment- Lowell Miller
    • Dividends Don't Lie by Geraldine Weiss
    • 100 Minds that Made the Market by Kenneth Fisher
    • A Treasury of Wall Street Wisdom- Harry Schultz
    • ABC of Stock Speculation- S.A. Nelson
    • Against the Gods- Peter Bernstein
    • Bear Markets- Harry Schultz
    • Beating the Dow by Michael O’Higgins
    • Dow 3000- Richard Shulman & Thomas Blamer
    • Dow Theory Today- Richard Russell
    • Dow Theory- Robert Rhea
    • General Semantics of Wall Street- John Magee
    • Investment Madness- John Nofsinger
    • The Great Crash- John Kenneth Galbraith
    • The Intelligent Investor- Benjamin Graham
    • The Stock Market Barometer- William Peter Hamilton
    • The Ultimate Dividend Playbook-Josh Peters


  • Email our team
  •