Myth #1: Companies that pay a dividend misallocate funds that could be used to generate new revenue. The lack of new revenue will keep the stocks price low over the short and long term.
This is the most fascinating myth that exists about dividend paying companies. The theory seemingly makes sense yet after cursory examination, the truth will out. Look at the 1-year performance of these select Mergent Dividend Achievers:
- Badger Meter (BMI) 96%
- Caterpillar (CAT) 66%
- Berkley (BER) 53%
- Aqua America (WTR) 59%
- Archer-Daniel-Midlands (ADM) 70%
- Franklin Resources (BEN) 52%
- Fuller (FUL) 55%
- Granite Construction (GVA) 92%
- Harleysville Group (HGIC) 50%
- Helemerich & Payne (HP) 114%
- La-Z-Boy (LZB) 67%
- Legg Mason (LG) 90%
- Martin Marietta (MLM) 70%
- McGrath (MGRC) 54%
- Meridian Biosciences (VIVO) 172%
- Nordson (NDSN) 52%
- Nucor (NUE) 92%
- Raven Industries (RAVN) 93%
- Questar (STR) 63%
- AO Smith (AOS) 80%
- State Auto Financial (STFC) 56%
- Schulman (SHLM) 60%
- SWS Group (SWS) 65%
- Tennant Co. (TNC) 58%
- Vulcan Materials (VLM) 53%
- West Pharma Services (WST) 60%
This list is for 1-year performance from Feb. 7, 2005 to Feb. 6, 2006. This does not include the dividend that was paid by these companies over this 1 year period.
As you’ll notice companies with 10%, 20%, 30% and 40% returns were not included. However, if they were included during this time frame I would have had to add 219 companies to this list. If anyone were to complain about receiving only 10% percent in one year with significantly reduced risk then investing in stocks may not be the place to be.